Inputs
Calls, meetings, prompted recordings, existing transcripts, model hypotheses, language requirements, and a target schema.
Turn recordings, transcripts, and production failures into consented, aligned language data with speaker context and review evidence intact.
Flinket starts with the model decision and the acceptance rule, then builds the collection, annotation, review, and delivery plan around them.
Calls, meetings, prompted recordings, existing transcripts, model hypotheses, language requirements, and a target schema.
Consented collection, transcription, normalization, translation, time alignment, diarization, language labels, and evaluation curation.
Accepted audio, segment timestamps, speaker IDs, structured labels, rights manifests, rejection reasons, and agreed data splits.
Audio validation, shared calibration data, native-language review, adjudication, label-specific agreement, and parser checks.
Your schema, your approved platform, or an agreed export with a QA report, issue taxonomy, and versioned manifest.
The program can start with buyer-owned audio or include new collection. Every workstream keeps source, consent, transformation, and review records connected.
Recruit against a buyer-defined speaker matrix, capture consent, and validate device, environment, duration, and recording instructions.
Transcribe, normalize, translate, align timestamps, identify speakers, and preserve code-switching or uncertainty where the guide requires it.
Apply intent, entity, topic, sentiment, toxicity, pronunciation, acoustic-event, and conversation-turn labels from the approved ontology.
Build evaluation slices around accents, noise, overlap, rare intents, unsafe responses, or other failures supplied by the model team.
The operating sequence stays visible from the first recording to the final loader check.
Name what the model must learn or measure, the allowed sources, and the acceptance rule.
Output: program specificationReview representative recordings, existing transcripts, and known failure cases before writing the guide.
Output: issue and coverage mapRun a small batch with the intended speakers, annotators, and reviewers, then resolve disagreements.
Output: accepted sample and edge-case guideRun file checks, route ambiguous language to review, and record corrections by task and label type.
Output: reviewed production dataTest the export against the agreed schema or parser and deliver the evidence behind acceptance.
Output: dataset, QA report, and manifestTranscription, speaker boundaries, intents, and acoustic events fail in different ways. They are checked and reported separately.
Representative sample
This example shows the shape of a delivery. Fields and labels change to match the buyer's schema and acceptance method.
The useful answer depends on the language, source rights, signal quality, and model job.
Yes, when the speaker profile, geography, consent terms, devices, prompts, and recording environment can be defined and supported for the program.
Flinket maps to a buyer-approved schema or agreed export. A representative slice is tested against the buyer's parser before the final handoff.
Review is matched to the signal. Audio checks, native-language review, domain review, double-pass review, and adjudication are applied where the acceptance rule requires them.
It can be scoped for a customer platform or approved processing environment when that environment supports the required contributor and review workflow.
Receive a sample transcript and label set, a rejection taxonomy, and a pilot acceptance plan.